Shopping malls such as battlefield, wanted to exterminate rival privately, but superficial to do, are also lie downin a “friends of” how, if that is the partner would have been more friendly, even contradictory rarely publicly complain, sharp criticism or accusation is even smaller. NVIDIA has not once complained about TSMC 28nm process problem, think the latter process of NVIDIA’s GPU release due to poor progress in delayed time and again, these complaints are fairly minor, but NVIDIA on TSMC is definitely “complain of deep, hate the cut.”
Privately complain that quite strongly, along with criticism of TSMC 20nm process in the future, think it’s not worth a penny (essentially worthless), they will not spend money on this process (there’s no money in 20nm), foreign media have recently published a detailed analysis of why.
These are NVIDIA ITPC meeting, held in November last year (International Trade Partner Conference) published on, should not be open to the public, because of taboo highly critical partners in the industry, such cases are very rare, XtremeTech Web site to see the content was shocked, do not know where they get the source.
NVIDIA first to ask what partners should do things, partners should understand the customer’s needs (note the underscore for emphasis), and to be open, candid and direct. (Perhaps this subtext is that TSMC early intentionally concealing the technology problems, or they think they are small problems, do not require communication with customers)
Development has always been radicals on NVIDIA video cards, per year (now once every 1.5 years to upgrade the schema) publishing graphics framework has significant growth, speed increase in the number of transistors, or even to more than Moore. In contrast GK104 of transistors only 3.54 billion, higher than previous-generation Fermi 3 billion chat a little.
(GTX performance than HD 7,970 680, but NVIDIA is also well aware of the subtle, leading the 3D performance is mainly due to the slightly higher frequencies, defeated on the GPU computing performance, in other words this is NVIDIA’s first leading competitors on the structure and size)
TSMC 28nm not in production last year, shipments of most GPU is 40&45nm technology
NVIDIA on the future technological development of TSMC to do analysis, 20nm process cost advantage compared to the previous generation of technology in reducing.
This is the cost of transistor size (cost-per-transistor) charts, 20nm process stages cost-per-transistor have no advantage.
There is a problem is the wafer costs are on the rise
Direct criticism of OEM partners have been very rare, and has done so many NVIDIA PPT data tell you partners can no longer the competitive production of next-generation technology, which is the creation of the first time. NVIDIA is really very angry, disappointed at the time, must find a vent out all grievances.
It has in the past have been for a long time, wonder if NVIDIA could calm, has recently released the GTX at least 680 on the performance, power consumption and cost should make him a little more easily.
Fab process upgrading is not so easy to do, not to mention TSMC will encounter problems, Samsung, IBM, GF even Intel has encountered problems, NVIDIA may wish to look at AMD is GF 32nm SOI do not temper the predicament, it didn’t feel so much better.
After this news issue, I wonder if NVIDIA rumor, after all, both sides are to cooperate, so revealing how much will hurt both sides now face, we see buzz is.
Text/Super network